Posts Tagged ‘health care costs’

Is Price Transparency the Key to Lowering Health Care Costs?

Most of us, when faced with needing a medical procedure, go to the provider our family physician recommends. We typically don’t find out how much it’s going to cost — or how much our insurance provider will cover — until after the fact. Comparison shopping isn’t something we think about when it comes to health care. But should it be?

The New York Times reports that price transparency could be just what the health care industry needs to drive costs down. Health care providers can charge premium rates for services without experiencing the price competition effect that other industries face, because costs are rarely discussed. Further, employers are paying large portions of health insurance costs, and insurance providers fund most or all of the cost of most medical care. So the end consumerHealth CAre Costs rarely has reason to question fees unless they receive a bill they expected to be covered.

A solution would be to make costs more transparent in health care. One startup company has emerged that will allow consumers to do just that: comparison shop for health care services. Castlight, an internet startup backed by venture capitalists, is building a search engine that will allow consumers to search for providers for a service or procedure in a general area and compare prices. Experts say this kind of transparency would result in price competition among medical providers, driving prices down. The company is even building a mobile application so patients can access information from anywhere – including the exam table.

As companies are starting to have employees shoulder more of the overwhelming cost of healthcare, Americans will be paying more out of pocket for health care services than ever before. The New York Times points to several studies that have shown that patients with more access to price information save more on health care than those that are shielded from costs. The industry trend is already heading in that direction: We have access to Nursing Home Compare, which helps consumers choose a skilled nursing facility. The main Medicare.gov site helps consumers compare and choose the right Medicare Part D plan. Why not compare hospitals, physicians, and procedure fees?

Castlight and similar health care price-shopping companies seem like the perfect solution, but there are a few challenges. For one, Castlight isn’t free to use. It signs employers on as customers, allowing employees access to the search engine (monthly fees are based on the number of employees). Also, physicians and insurance companies often have negotiated fees that are agreed to be kept secret, for competitive reasons. Some insurance companies have shared information with Castlight, while other information is obtained through EOBs (Explanation of Benefits) that patients receive.

Industry pressures may provide better access to information soon. Eventually, Castlight plans to introduce a website available for anyone’s use, and it’s likely that more companies will follow suit.

Image Copyright lute1 on Stock.xchng

Democrats Pushing for Six-Month Launch Date for Senior Care

The new health reform law includes a component called the Independence at Home (IAH) program, which is set to take effect on or before January 1, 2012. But a few Democratic proponents of the plan are pushing CMS to implement the program even sooner — within the next six months.

The IAH program aims to benefit chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries by encouraging teams of physicians and nurse practitioners to make house calls to the most vulnerable Medicare recipients. The VA enacted a similar program and successfully reduced hospital admissions by 25 percent and total healthcare costs by 15 percent, according to The Hill.

Currently, 5 percent of Medicare recipients account for 40 percent of total Medicare costs, a number which could be drastically reduced with improved efficiency in delivering care to this population. The program will hold providers responsible for reducing healthcare costs — if costs aren’t reduced by 5 percent, they don’t get paid by Medicare. The cost savings are divided between the provider and Medicare, providing further incentive for practitioners to comply.

This system represents a shift in thinking, according to George Taler, a physician at the Washington Hospital Center and an AAHCP (American Academy of Home Care Physicians) board member, who is quoted in The Hill’s article as saying, “In the current system, the more we do, the more we get paid. And so we do more.” Under the new program, physicians would earn more money by saving money, and so it creates a paradigm shift.

The IAH program is being implemented as a three-year pilot program, although proponents are encouraging CMS to extend the program beyond an initial three years and to  include at least 5,500 participants in the program.

Does Staying Healthy Reduce Your Lifetime Health Care Costs?

The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College studied the relationship between good health and the total amount of money spent on health care over a lifetime. They found that while retirees who are in good health face less health care costs at the present time, they actually end up spending more on health care costs overall than retirees who are unhealthy.

The primary reason for this is that individuals and families free of chronic illness tend to live longer, and therefore can incur higher overall costs over time. The findings are counterintuitive, however, and the research is complicated by a lack of quality data. However, researchers were able to use available data and simulate costs, accounting for socioeconomic status, insurance coverage, and other factors.

Interestingly, at any given point of time, individuals having ever had a diagnosis of a chronic illness have higher healthcare costs. But even though chronic illness is a predictor of requiring long-term care, those same individuals have lower lifetime health care costs than individuals who were free of chronic illness at the initial data collection. Age doesn’t appear to be a factor; Lifetime costs for individuals free of chronic illness remained higher regardless of age.

Don’t use health as a factor when planning for long-term care

The takeaway from this study is that individuals and couples who are free of chronic illness, even in their 60s and 70s, shouldn’t discount the need to plan and save for long-term care under the assumption that their costs will be lower. In fact, individuals free of chronic illness should plan for a longer lifespan and higher lifetime health care costs. Delaying the purchase of life insurance can be a costly mistake, as well. Current health is no indicator of whether you could eventually be diagnosed with a chronic or life-threatening illness, and once you have  pre-existing condition, life insurance premiums become very costly.