Archive for the ‘Obama's Health Care Plan’ Category

Medicare Bundled Payments a New Money-Saving Tactic

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is implementing a new bundled payment structure for medical providers as part of the Affordable Care Act, a tactic which could save Medicare money. The strategy incentivizes providers to work together, shifting the focus from payments based on the quantity of care to one focused on quality. Currently, physicians have no financial incentive to help patients to quick recovery; in fact, the more office visits a patient makes, the more money the physician earns. CMS introduces bundled payments

Bundled payments will also force providers to work collaboratively to effectively manage patient care. Instead of a per-visit sum, a predetermined fee will be paid for, say, heart attack care, and nurses, specialists and various care settings must coordinate their care across settings to treat the patient. Electronic health records management will become essential in the success of this initiative, according to an article on GovHealthIT.com.

Called “Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative,” the program could potentially revamp the way patients are cared for. Currently, each provider, such as the physician, hospital, skilled nursing facility and surgeon, sends a separate bill to Medicare. In essence, this is a really inefficient and scattered method, but it’s the one providers are accustomed to. Because only a set fee will be paid for an “episode of care,” providers will earn more by treating patients quickly and more effectively. An episode of care is a specific illness requiring a period of care, such as a hip replacement, and would include the initial evaluation, hospital stay, treatment and any post-operative care.

Bundled payments will most certainly force providers to offer a better continuum of care and reduce unnecessary duplication of services, such as repeat tests in different settings. In order to ease the transition, CMS has opened an application process for providers willing to participate in a testing phase. Participating providers will be able to choose from four broad bundled payment structures and will have input into what classifies as an episode of care and what services are included, which will help customize the program for providers of different sizes and capabilities.

GovHealthIT.com reports on a demonstration project which showed the potential for bundled payments to save money: “For example, a Medicare heart bypass surgery bundled payment demonstration saved the program $42.3 million, or about 10 percent of expected costs, and saved patients $7.9 million in co-insurance payments while improving care and lowering hospital mortality.”

The approach makes a lot of sense for patients and will result in a smoother transition across settings. Patients will have greater confidence that their providers are well informed of their condition, prior testing and treatment. Providers may struggle with the increased coordination required and the initial shift in thinking from a quantity-based to a quality-based approach as a financial incentive, but it’s precisely this financial incentive that will force practitioners to act in ways that make the most sense for the patient.

Image Copyright misterhyun on Stock.xchng

Nursing Homes Face Uncertain Economic Future

Nursing homes in nearly all 50 states are looking into their future with uncertainty, as Medicare and Medicaid cuts seem certain. Further, skilled nursing facilities are required to comply with the Affordable Care Act, which mandates that employers with 50 or more employees provide health insurance or pay a shared responsibility fee. According to a White House brief, 96 percent of all employers with more than 50 employees already provide ample coverage. Many nursing homes, however, do not offer health insurance to hourly employees. Many nursing home and home care workers are uninsured

The New York Times recently reported on the growing concern of many nursing homes and home care agencies who are petitioning for exclusion from the new law. Twenty-five percent of nursing facility staff and 33 percent of home care workers are uninsured. Low wage-earners who work for organizations that do offer coverage often can’t afford premiums.

Mark Parkinson, president of the American Health Care Association, is active in lobbying efforts to exclude nursing homes and home care providers from the requirement. According to Parkinson, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates are too low to allow health providers to cover the cost of insurance for workers. Potential cuts to these reimbursement rates only further complicate the issue. Skilled nursing facilities who opt out of providing coverage will face a penalty, which The Times estimates could exceed $200,000 per year for a mid-size facility.

Charlene A. Harrington, professor at the School of Nursing at the University of California in San Francisco, has a different take on the situation. She feels that nursing homes and other healthcare providers should not be exempt from the requirements, pointing out that direct care workers with adequate health care coverage are more likely to be treated for illness and, therefore, less likely to pass dangerous infections to residents.

Parkinson has suggested a number of alternative solutions, such as exempting only those organizations who enter financial distress as a result of compliance or allowing penalties to be used as a tax write-off.

Image Copyright asterisco on Stock.xchng

States Restructure Senior Care in Wake of Recession

Many states have made cuts to aging and disability services budgets, according to a recent report conducted by the AARP Public Policy Institute; yet, demand for such services hasn’t slowed — in fact, demand for senior care and disability services continues to grow at an alarming rate. The report surveyed programs and funding in all 50 U.S. states, finding that 31 states cut aging and disability budgets (non-Medicare) in the 2010 fiscal year, and 28 states expected to make cuts in the 2011 fiscal year. Balancing state aging and disability services budgets

The report, Weathering the Storm: The Impact of the Great Recession on Long-Term Services and Supports, finds that state incomes are expected to be below pre-recession levels in 2011, as funding from major sources is still down, including personal income, sales and corporate taxes. Increasing demands for services are forcing states to place restrictions on non-Medicaid long-term services and supports (LTSS), although these programs are currently bolstered through funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). ARRA funds are set to expire in June 2011, when states will be faced with more difficult decisions.

Most Medicaid cuts focused on cuts to provider payments, although a few states implemented service cuts, particularly personal care services. This is a concern because during a recession, demand for payment assistance increases as more families facing financial hardship qualify for assistance.

One bright spot in the midst of this funding crisis is the Affordable Care Act, which aids states in expanding efforts for home and community-based services; however, many states are hesitant to embrace such programs until government initiatives provide ample guidance.

Image Copyright srbichara on Stock.xchng

Advance Care Planning Now Possible Under Medicare

Effective January 1, 2011, seniors will have the option of voluntary advance care planning under the Medicare benefit. This same benefit was initially included in the original health care overhaul, but opponents successfully abolished it from the initial reform bill with a public outry labeling the practice “death panels” and calling it “government-sponsored euthanasia,” according to OregonLive.com. End-of-life discussions

Some say that opponents of the reform bill merely took the opportunity to turn the public against health care reform. Others say that encouraging and funding end-of-life discussions may lead seniors to forego life-sustaining or life-extending treatments they may otherwise have opted to receive.

Encouraging end-of-life talk is not new in the healthcare industry. In the past decade, pioneers have stressed the importance of educating the public about their options when it comes to end-of-life treatments and encouraging them to make their own choices about the treatments they choose to receive. It’s standard practice in many assisted living facilities and nursing homes for social workers to aid residents in end-of-life planning.

Any adult can legally elect to receive — or not — different types of life-sustaining treatments in the event of terminal illness or catastrophic injury. These documents are referred to as advance directives, living wills, or “Do Not Resuscitate” orders. Laws on these documents vary from state to state, as do the specific meanings of the terms.

In some instances, a “Do Not Resuscitate” order simply indicates a person does not wish to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or advanced cardiac life support if the heart stops beating, while an advance directive or living will — in most cases — details the different circumstances under which an individual wishes to receive a variety of life-sustaining treatments, such as intubation (feeding tube) or being placed on a ventilator.

The new regulation will enable seniors to (at their own choosing) consult with a physician and receive assistance filling out end-of-life forms. The question at the center of this debate is whether or not such discussions will cause seniors to feel pressure to opt out of treatments they actually want.

What are your thoughts on the subject? Do end-of-life discussions discourage seniors from receiving life sustaining treatments or serve as a means to educate on the options and empower seniors to make their own decisions?

Image Copyright mapelc on Stock.xchng

Nursing Homes, Assisted Living Fear Medicaid Cuts After Political Shake-Up

The November 5, 2010 election brought about some changes in the federal government, with the Republican party earning the majority of seats needed to take over the House of Representatives. Healthcare reform has been a major bone of contention between Democrats and Republicans since Barack Obama was elected U.S. President in 2008, and the GOP-controlled House now has the power to block some major reform proposals. The fact that Republicans failed to earn the majority needed to take control of the Senate, however, should make for some interesting political discourse over the next several months as both sides fight to secure their stance in the heated healthcare debate. U.S. Senate

Nursing homes, which have benefited from Democratic-led enhanced Medicaid funding for states,  have expressed particular concern over the shake-up. Kaiser Health News reports on several credible news outlets who have covered the issue, including The Hill, McKnight’s Long-Term Care News, and Modern Healthcare. According to The Hill, nursing homes and assisted living facilities rely on Medicaid payments for approximately two-thirds of resident funding, and a return to the standard federal rate could prove devastating financially.

If Medicaid spending is cut, the CLASS Act is one component of reform that could help fill in the gaps. However, few employers have signed up to participate in the program thus far. Further, some Republican leaders are moving to repeal the CLASS Act out of fear that it, too, will incur additional government spending if employee contributions aren’t sufficient to cover costs.

According to Bruce Yarwood, President and CEO of the American Health Care Association (AHCA), long-term care was an issue that hasn’t received the necessary attention so far in the ongoing healthcare reform debate. He says the AHCA has reached out to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Brookings Institution to create pilot programs that would revamp the current payment system: Instead of issuing payments based on the type of residential care setting, payments would be made based on each patient’s individual condition and needs.

Yarwood says that if enhanced Medicaid payments are on the table next year, the AHCA will continue to fight in favor of an extension.

Image Copyright harrykeely on Stock.xchng

It’s Official: Medicare Physician Fees Reduced by Nearly 25 Percent

Today, November 3, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a final rule that improves access to preventative care for Medicare beneficiaries — but also issues a steep 23% cut to Medicare physician fees that will take effect December 1, 2010. The cut will be followed by an additional reduction of 1.9% scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2011. Medicare physician fees reduced

The cut comes under the sustainable growth-rate formula. While previous attempts to reduce Medicare physician payments were thwarted by Congress (they delayed a scheduled cut of 20% in June 2010), CMS calls the current measure “critical,” according to an article on ModernHealthcare.com, and says officials “are committed to permanently reforming the Medicare payment formula.”

Home health care agencies will also experience a reduction of 4.89% in 2011. However, the new rules also include payment incentives of 10% for primary-care providers and general surgeons in areas considered health professional shortage areas under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The reduction figure does account for inflation, wage updates, and other factors.

Finally, outpatient hospital payments face greater accountability in the form of increased quality reporting requirements. In order to qualify for full payment, hospitals must report a total of 15 quality measures in 2012 and an additional 8 quality measures in 2013.

Senior advocates fear that these latest measures will actually result in reduced access to medical care for seniors, as they predict that physicians and hospital systems will stop accepting Medicare payments due to reduced fees and increased accountability.

Image Copyright linusb4 on Stock.xchng

Navigating Care Options is About to Become Easier

On Monday, September 27, 2010, the Department of Health and Human Services announced $68 million in grants to help seniors, families, and caregivers navigate available health care options. The grants are part of the Affordable Care Act and will be distributed to states, territories, and community-based organizations. wheelchair

The funds will be used to help both seniors and persons with disabilities (along with their families and caregivers) navigate the complex landscape of care options in several ways:

  • Understand Medicare and Medicaid benefits (including preventive services coverage)
  • Navigate options for long-term care, including community-based services that help individuals remain in their homes
  • Assist in transitioning individuals from nursing homes and rehab facilities back to the home through support services

The grants will be administered by the Department of Health and Human Services Administration on Aging and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and will compliment President Obama’s Community Living Initiative.

The focus of the Affordable Care Act is to empower individuals to take control over their own care, while at the same time lowering costs and improving quality, according to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebilius. The grants announced Monday will help individuals and their families cope with sudden or chronic illness by providing easier access to information about the care that’s available, eliminating one of the many complexities that can cause unnecessary stress during already difficult times.

Read the HHS Press Release

Image Copyright betacam on Stock.xchng

Implementing “Accountable Care Organizations” a Priority for Berwick

Newly-instated Medicare chief Donald Berwick is wasting no time implementing the government’s proposed new health care model of accountable care organizations, according to a report that appeared in The Boston Globe today. Berwick, former Harvard professor and Cambridge health guru, has kept a low profile after controversy surrounded his appointment as head of Medicare. reducing Medicare costs

Behind the scenes, however, Berwick has been moving ahead quickly with plans to launch between 100 and 300 sites that will test new models of care designed to cut costs and improve the quality of care. The new model is expected to pave the way for a shift from “fee-for-service” care to a “global payments” system. “Under global payments, physicians are paid flat fees for coordinating care for populations of patients, with built-in financial incentives for keeping them healthy and reducing hospital stays,” says Christopher Rowland, Globe Staff.

Test sites are expected to launch by the end of 2011, but this also marks an important turning point for Berwick and the Medicare program. Berwick, who was at the center of politicial controversy at the time of his recess appointment, will have to win over some Republican senators over the next year to avoid being ousted when his recess appointment expires — accordingly, at the end of 2011.

Among Berwick’s other priority tasks are cutting the fat from extra payments being made by the government to private insurance companies for sponsoring Medicare Advantage programs, as well as overseeing the drastic expansion of Medicaid services in many states.

Image Copyright alexkalina on Stock.xchng

Seniors Receive Free Preventative Care Under Health Law

Beginning in January 2011, seniors will find it easier to access preventative care. Medicare recipients will receive free annual wellness visits, free preventative care, and free screenings with an A or B recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which include tests like mammograms, colorectal cancer screenings, and bone mass analysis. free preventative care

As additional recommendations are available from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, these routine and preventative tests will also be free of charge. Annual wellness visits will assess medical and family history, as well as a personal risk assessment and an analysis of the patient’s abilities and risk of injury.

Identifying these risks at an early stage will allow physicians and other medical professionals to recommend and make referrals to appropriate support services prior to injuries and progression of chronic disease. For example, a patient at risk of developing heart disease or diabetes may be referred to a nutritional counselor.

No out-of-pocket costs will apply to preventative care, which can add up to a significant savings for a senior. For example, an article on SeniorMarketAdvisor.com notes that an average female Medicare recipient could be paying up to $300 out-of-pocket for a mammogram, colon cancer screening, flu shot, diabetes and cholesterol testing, and a pap smear — all of which will be free under the new Affordable Care Act.

These new rules will result in cost savings for the Medicare program over time, as well, by avoiding some costly medical procedures and treatments that occur as a result of inadequate preventative care. Chronic conditions, such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes account for 75% of health care spending in the United States, according to the newly-launched government health care resource HealthCare.gov, and many of these conditions are preventable.

Image Copyright wolak on Stock.xchng

Seniors Confused by Health Care Reform

A recent survey by the National Council on Aging suggests that many seniors are perplexed about health care reform — in fact, only 17% of respondents could correctly answer half of the questions related to health reform posed during the study, and only 9% said they felt “very familiar” with the law.roundabout

Despite the attempts of many senior care organizations to dispel popular myths about health care reform and to promote understanding among the senior population, many seniors remain unaware of how certain aspects of the law will impact them. For example, in relation to the widespread myth that Medicare payments will be cut to physicians, only 14% of seniors surveyed knew that was not true. 41% said they did not know the answer, and 45% said they believed the law would cut Medicare payments to physicians.

Only a third of respondents (33%) were aware that the new law would mandate a free, yearly wellness visit to a doctor each year. Closer to half (43%) of respondents knew that health coverage would be expanded to 32 million currently uninsured Americans, and 42% were aware that the Medicare Part D “donut hole” will be phased out.

The National Council on Aging has published a fact sheet entitled “5 Key Facts on the Affordable Health Care Act,” which provides details on the following points:

  1. Medicare benefits won’t be cut under the new law. In fact, some benefits will be improved.
  2. Medicare spending will still grow, but at a slower pace. The budget deficit is projected to decrease as a result of these changes.
  3. Obtaining long-term care at home will be easier and more affordable.
  4. Care for older adults will be improved in other ways, such as advanced training for providers and improved quality standards.
  5. Health insurance coverage for younger Americans who don’t have Medicare will be improved.

Image Copyright ColinBroug on Stock.xchng